Therefore, all these so-called improvements has resulted in gross immorality, crime, deep anxieties, depression, and deterioration of values. We are thankful that we lived through the past 60 years, the lessons we learned about integrity and appreciation of true values have been largely missed by the present generation.
When we start out on a trip, do we fear an automobile wreck or that the plane will crash? No, we start out giving thanks for God�s presence, knowing that He is with us every mile of the way. How could one say, �Thank you Father, for being with me on this trip, but I�m afraid of what might happen during your presence?� If we are honest about God�s abiding presence, we will not fear the possibilities, for He can handle them.
Under the worst circumstances, the giving of thanks brings to our minds the fact that god has gone to the very limit to save us from sin and death. Paul wrote: �He that spared not his own son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?� (Romans 8:32) He gave His only Son to die in shame, to meet the penalty for sin, then He raised Him from the dead and made him Lord of heaven and earth. �There is therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus.� (Romans 8:1) Free from sin, guilt and condemnation. Free from fear. Thank God!
As mentioned earlier, we are all terminal; we are mortal. Immortality is yet to be conferred, in the day of resurrection; giving thanks to god for the hope of that immortality will turn one�s focus from earth, with all its hazards and fears, to the assurance and comfort of God; from the dismal sorrows of the world to the joys and glories of the Kingdom of Christ.
Soren Kierkegaard once wrote in a devotion: �To you, Lord Jesus Christ: we pray that you will draw us entirely to you...if only you will draw us, then indeed all is won, even if, humanly speaking, we win nothing; and nothing is los, even if, humanly speaking, we lose everything.�
Rest assured that they will be destroyed for God has said it and it is done.
�Wherefore it shall come to pass, that when the Lord hath performed his whole work upon mount Zion and on Jerusalem, I WILL PUNISH THE FRUIT OF THE STOUT HEART...AND THE GLORY OF HIS HIGH LOOKS. For he saith, By the strength of my hand I have done it, and by my wisdom; for I am prudent: and I HAVE REMOVED THE BOUNDS OF THE PEOPLE (caused the heathen of the world to move to parts of the earth that God never intended for them to move to), AND HAVE ROBBED THEIR (Israel) TREASURES, AND I HAVE PUT DOWN THE INHABITANTS LIKE A VALIANT MAN (the Jews are not mighty fighters, they only appear so because of the strength of the Israel people whom they control through their traitorous agents): And MY HAND HATH FOUND AS A NEST THE RICHES OF THE PEOPLE (the Israel People): and AS ONE GATHERETH EGGS THAT ARE LEFT, HAVE I GATHERED ALL THE EARTH (the Jews have or the children of Satan have gathered riches from all over the earth); and THERE WAS NONE THAT MOVED THE WING, OR OPENED THE MOUTH, OR PEEPED (none of the watchmen in the Judeo-Christian churches uttered a word of warning against these evil ones). Shall the axe boast itself against him that heweth therewith? or shall the saw magnify itself against him that shaketh it? as if the rod should shake itself against them that lift it up, or as if the staff should lift up itself, as if it were no wood. THEREFORE SHALL THE LORD, THE LORD OF HOSTS, SEND AMONG HIS FAT ONES LEANNESS, AND UNDER HIS GLORY HE SHALL KINDLE A BURNING LIKE THE BURNING OF A FIRE. AND THE LIGHT OF ISRAEL SHALL BE FOR A FIRE, AND HIS HOLY ONE FOR A FLAME, AND IT SHALL BURN AND DEVOUR HIS THORNS AND HIS BRIERS IN ONE DAY (the Jews and their bootlicks will be destroyed - the second witness is in Obadiah 1:18); And shall consume the glory of his forest, and of his fruitful field, both soul and body: and they shall be as when a standard-bearer fainteth. And THE REST OF THE TREES (men) OF HIS FOREST SHALL BE FEW (there will be none of the Jews left for all they will be destroyed and few of their agents will be left. They will be so few that even children will not be afraid of them), THAT A CHILD MAY WRITE THEM. And it shall come to pass in that day, that the remnant of Israel, and such as are escaped of the house of Jacob,� shall no more again stay upon him that smote them; but shall stay upon the LORD, the Holy One of Israel, in truth. THE REMNANT SHALL RETURN, EVEN THE REMNANT OF JACOB, UNTO THE MIGHTY GOD. For THOUGH THY PEOPLE ISRAEL BE AS THE SAND OF THE SEA, YET A REMNANT OF THEM SHALL RETURN (here God is showing us that even though there are countless Israelites, there will be only a few which will accomplish His will): the consumption decreed shall overflow with righteousness. For the Lord GOD of hosts shall make a consumption, even determined, in the midst of all the land. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD of hosts, O my people that dwellest in Zion, be not afraid of the Assyrian: he shall smite thee with a rod, and shall lift up his staff against thee, after the manner of Egypt. For yet a very little while, and the indignation shall cease, and mine anger in their destruction. And the LORD of hosts shall stir up a scourge for him according to the slaughter of Midian at the rock of Oreb (�And the men of Israel gathered themselves together out of Naphtali, and out of Asher, and out of all Manasseh, and pursued after the Midianites. And Gideon sent messengers throughout all mount Ephraim, saying, Come down against the Midianites, and take before them the waters unto Beth‑barah and Jordan. Then all the men of Ephraim gathered themselves together, and took the waters unto Beth‑barah and Jordan. And they took two princes of the Midianites, Oreb and Zeeb; and they slew Oreb upon the rock Oreb, and Zeeb they slew at the winepress of Zeeb, and pursued Midian, and brought the heads of Oreb and Zeeb to Gideon on the other side Jordan.� (Judges 7:23‑25)): and as his rod was upon the sea, so shall he lift it up after the manner of Egypt. And it shall come to pass in that day, that his burden shall be taken away from off thy shoulder, and his yoke from off thy neck, and the yoke shall be destroyed because of the anointing.� (Isaiah 10:12‑27)
For the second witness Obadiah 1:18 relates: �And THE HOUSE OF JACOB SHALL BE A FIRE, AND THE HOUSE OF JOSEPH A FLAME, AND THE HOUSE OF ESAU FOR STUBBLE, AND THEY SHALL KINDLE IN THEM, AND DEVOUR THEM (in the Jews), AND THERE SHALL NOT BE ANY REMAINING OF THE HOUSE OF ESAU (there will be no Jews left, for ALL will be destroyed. Esau is in modern Jewry, so says the Jewish Encyclopedia); for the LORD hath spoken it.�
We should relate here so that it is more clear that; Israel (the White Peoples of the world) are God�s ONLY chosen race, and His ONLY servant people. Some people in the Israel community who may be fearful of God�s enemies and the evil �government� (under the control of the Jews - WM), are eager to disassociate themselves from all others in the Israel community who use certain phrases or words that are volatile and which draw persecution (words like �white,� �master race,� �supremacy,� etc.). In obvious confusion (which always accompanies fear, neither of which came from God) some people will try and go to the other extreme and suggest that the White Race, Israel, is certainly �not� the superior race; for they are the servant race. If anything, they say, we are equals. THIS IS IDIOCY. Yes, WE ARE THE SERVANT RACE, but a servant of whom? WE (the White Race) ARE GOD�S SERVANT; NOT THE SERVANT OF THE OTHER RACES OF THE WORLD (for this itself is expressly forbidden). God chose Israel from among all the peoples of the world and elevated, exalted, predestined, redeemed, saved, died for, and blessed her far beyond imagination; and her ALONE. Israel is the ONLY people whom God has sanctified and made holy, the ONLY race whose bloodlines have been preserved impunity, the ONLY race to whom God gave His Word and His Spirit with all POWER and AUTHORITY. Israel is the ONLY people whom God has chosen to be the ministers and administrators of His Law, Worship, Praise, and Glory. However, (as He promised) through Israel, God HAS blessed the entire earth.
Yes, Israel is a servant, but NOT hopelessly a servant to sin (like all the other races). Israel is a servant of righteousness; the servant of God Himself. Each (called by God) Christian/Israelite is a Priest before God, and a King under the King of kings. Priests and Kings are NOT chosen from among the sickly, the diseased, the maimed, the ignorant, the polluted, or even the common blood. (As the sacrifices attest, because only an animal without blemish was chosen to be sacrificed on the Altar to God - WM) Further, most often, even the kings of the earth do not choose the unsightly, diseased, incompetent, maimed, degenerate, filthy, and base-blooded people to be their servants or eunuchs; they chose, even from among the baser races, the finest that can be found. Though the servant is inferior to the Master; the servant of the King, is himself more noble, esteemed, and �considered superior� to the common people below him who were not chosen to the honorable position. Yes, it is honorable to be the servant of a King. In most of the nations of the world, throughout history, the king has lived in luxury, wealth, and glory, with the finest food, clothing, palace, and comfort; while the common person has sweated and labored in the dirt, earning barely enough to feed his family; they have lived in dirty, tattered, and base hovels scarcely sheltered from the elements, with no luxuries, no comforts, no education, health care, or security; and further, they have often been oppressed by bandits and tax collectors alike. However, he who was chosen to be a servant of the king was lifted above all this, and enjoyed the blessings of living with the king: for a king does not want his servants who is close to him, to live in common with the other people in filth, disease, and in the company of the basest of people whose ill manners may rub off on his servant. Of course the servant is inferior TO THE KING, BUT HE IS FAR SUPERIOR TO THOSE WHO ARE NOT CHOSEN.� (The War Between The Children of Light and The Powers of Darkness, Robert Alan Balaicius, pp. 489-490).
So if you are a White Man or Woman be proud that you are a child of the King, the King of the Universe, our Savior and our King. As we give thanks to God, He draws us closer to Himself and farther form the reach of the evil one and his children, closer to His image and farther from the world�s fashion, closer to final victory and farther from the danger of defeat. IN EVERYTHING GIVE THANKS, �For God gave us not a spirit of fearfulness; but of power, and of love and discipline.� �THANKS BE TO GOD, WHO GIVE US THE VICTORY THROUGH OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST.� (1 Corinthians 15:57) (Taken in part from The Witness, P.O. Box 292663, Lewisville, Texas 75029, Curtis Dickinson, Editor, (972) 219-2277)
There is always someone who does not want to learn the truth about God�s enemies; they wish to remain ignorant due to their cowardance; because they are afraid that if they stand up for our Lord and Savior they will take a chance on losing their material goods in the hear and now. But know you this, all you who stand and tremble in the presence of God�s enemies: THE FEARFUL AND COWARDLY CANNOT ENTER INTO GOD�S KINGDOM. This is found in the Book of Revelation 21:7‑8: �He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. BUT THE FEARFUL, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.�
Fearful: Strong�s Concordance: #1169� deilos (di‑los'); from deos (dread); timid, i.e. (by implication) faithless: KJV‑‑ fearful.
So you can clearly see that the fearful or cowardly are really faithless, and therefore
cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Also, now you know why there are those who will run from a list that allows the truth to be presented. They are afraid, and so run for the safety of their spiritual foxholes; never realizing that by this very act exhibit their unfaithfulness.
Therefore, I will continue to do as commanded, until God calls me home, in 2 Timothy 4:1‑5: �I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.�
The prophecy of these verses have, without doubt, come true in America today;
for there is no doubt that the Judeo-Christians; following their false and deceitful
Judeo-Christian Clergy, will not endure sound doctrine; and they follow after their own lusts and have heaped to themselves teachers (Preachers, Evangelists, Ministers, and etc.), having itching ears; that turn them away from the truth, and teach them Jewish fables. So it is with those on the so-called Christian lists, when someone comes along and is attempting to teach them the True Gospel of The Kingdom of God.
I do my duty as a watchman on the wall of Israel, and care not if people like me or not for my boss, Yahweh is the only one I care to please.
To whom was Christ speaking when he said, "And say, if we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them IN THE BLOOD OF THE PROPHETS," Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that YE ARE THE CHILDREN OF THEM WHICH KILLED THE PROPHETS." and "That upon you may come ALL THE RIGHTEOUS BLOOD SHED UPON THE EARTH, from the blood of righteous Able unto the blood of Zacharias, the son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar." (Matthew 23:30-35 and Luke 11:49-51)
Revelation 18:24: "And in her WAS FOUND THE BLOOD OF PROPHETS AND OF� SAINTS AND OF ALL THAT WERE SLAIN UPON THE EARTH."
After Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 A.D., who is it that said, "...We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places: thus saith the Lord of hosts, They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall call them, the border of wickedness, and, The people against whom the Lord hath indignation for ever." (Malachi 1:4)
And, "Thus saith the Lord God; Because the enemy hath said against you, aha, EVEN THE ANCIENT HIGH PLACES ARE OURS IN POSSESSION." (Ezekiel 36:2)
To whom did God declare: "And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it." (Obadiah 18)
To what people did the apostle John say Christ was speaking to when He said:
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44)
"...because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not."; "He that is of God heareth God's words; ye therefore hear them not, BECAUSE YE ARE NOT OF GOD." (John 8:44-47)
"I told you, and ye believed not;" (John 10:25)
"But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you." (John 10:26)
Who are the people who murdered Christ? "...For ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews." "Who both killed Christ, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men." (1 Thessalonians 2:14-15; John 19:14-18; Acts 2:26; 4:8-10; 5:30; 10:39; 13:27-29; Luke 24:20)
Who are the people who deny Christ is God come in a flesh body? "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father." (1 John 2:22-23)
And, "Hereby know ye the spirit of God: every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God. And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God; and this is the spirit of antichrist." (1 John 4:2-3)
And, "For many deceivers are entered into the world who confess not that Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist." (2 John 7)
A). Who are the people who now occupy that "great city" Jerusalem?
B). Who are the people our false ministers have proclaimed to be God's chosen people?
C). Who are the people that hate Christ and openly deny Him and His teachings?
D). Who are the people run out of every country after they have been found out?
E). Who are today's money changers and print worthless pieces of paper and steal our people's wealth and eat out the substance of our land?
F). Who are the people that reject the Bible and follow the teachings of the Talmud?
G). What people have declared war upon all Christians as is taught from their beloved Talmud?
The answer to all of these questions is one and the same - the Christ hating, anti-Christ JEWS!!
Citizenship Requirements: Now we come to the last important question in our study; what is the entrance requirements to this City wherein God dwells and which promises a new government, a new existence, and a new way of life? We know from Scripture that to possess immortality, we must be incapable of sinning (the wages of sin is death), We know of no one who is, or who has been (with the exception of Christ), incapable of sinning. Immortality requires sinlessness, therefore, we cannot inherit the New Jerusalem as long as we are in these mortal bodies.
However, there are some who are teaching that we are in the kingdom now, that Christ is reigning as King in this kingdom, and that the resurrection occurred in 70 A.D. The disturbing thought that the resurrection has occurred and we have been left out brings to mind the following from "The Purpose of the Resurrection," by Stephen E. Jones: "The first resurrection had not occurred when Paul mentioned Hymenaeus and Philetus. There are some teachers today who say that the first resurrection occurred in 70 A.D. at the destruction of Jerusalem. The Jehovah's Witnesses say the resurrection occurred in 1914 A.D. The problem is, no one can point to any resurrected saint and say, 'See, that man died a hundred years ago and is now alive, immortal, and incorruptible.
Let's elect him as our president so that he can rule and reign on the earth as the Scriptures say!' If the resurrection is already past, then where are they? Why are they not ruling? Why have they not 'bound Satan' (Revelation 20:2)? Why are they not administering true justice and righteousness in the earth by the Law of God? Why do evil men yet flourish?
Once gain, the only explanation we get is that they were 'raised spiritually' in such a manner that no one perceived it. We are asked to see it with 'the eye of faith,' because it all happened in secret, and these saints are all in heaven and have little or no influence in the government on earth.
All these views redefine resurrection in terms of the dead going to heaven in some spiritual state, rather than in the likeness of Jesus' resurrected body. Whenever men say that the resurrection occurred in the past, but they cannot point to resurrected saints to support their view, they have redefined resurrection and adopted the pagan Greek view of resurrection.
They are saying that when the dead are raised, they go into a spiritual state that is apart from matter. All these views destroy the doctrine of the resurrection.� So if any man comes teaching that the resurrection is already past, whether they say it occurred in Matthew 27 or in 70 A.D. or in 1914 A.D., it is simply an extension of the doctrine of Hymenaeus and Philetus.
Do not be among those whose faith is overturned, by such teachings.� Those who teach that the resurrection occurred in 70 A.D., tell us that Paul's writings about the resurrection were completed before 70 A.D., and therefore he could not have known that the resurrection would occur in so short a time.
While on the surface this may sound plausible, we need to remember exactly what is meant by 'resurrection.' The gospels are replete with evidence of the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ. Additionally, Paul emphasizes the physical resurrection of Jesus the Christ in his first epistle to the Corinthians. He reminds those to whom he is writing that '...if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins. Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished. If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.' Paul is saying that if in this mortal body, this ailing body, this sinful body we have hope, we are most miserable. In other words, if during our life here and how we can worship and believe and have faith in Christ, we are most miserable because that would be the end of it."
Stephen Jones is correct; those teaching that the resurrection has already occurred have redefined resurrection. DO NOT FALL FOR IT!� A Distinction of Words: It appears that those who teach this doctrine fail to distinguish between being "reborn" (or having a "new birth") and being "resurrected." Our English words "born again" mean a "regeneration," not a "resurrection." When we are "born again," we have been drawn to Christ by the Father (John 6:44), and we become "born of God." (1 John 3:9) We become "...born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth forever." (1 Peter 1:23)
This is a spiritual regeneration that heralds the replacement of our natural or carnal insight with the insight of the Holy Spirit. It is what is meant by "being led by the Spirit."� There are separate and distinct words for "regeneration" and "resurrection" in Greek; the Greek word "anastasis" means "a rising or raising up" and is translated as "resurrection" in English, while the Greek word "anagegennemenoi" means "having been generated again" and is translated as "born again" in English.
Thus we can see that there are two processes that we must experience in our walk.� To document further a physical resurrection, let us turn to the ninth verse of Paul's letter to the Romans: "Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over Him."
Here we see that Paul pictures Christ as being raised from the dead, and when He was raised from the dead, death had no dominion, or no power, over Him any longer. this is called the resurrection, and it is the hope of you and I who are called according to His purposes.
The hope of every believer is in the resurrection, it is this transformation process that we look forward to.� What we have in this life is not that transformation, it is regeneration. Even in regeneration we still experience all the problems of the flesh; the sin, the sicknesses, the worries, and the confusion.
Is this, as some are trying to tell us, what we have to look forward to? We tell you that it is not! Right now we are experiencing the trails of this life whether it be from government, sickness, loss of income, or family problems. In our present bodies, we have neither the power nor the righteousness required to keep a new type of government righteous even if we could put one in place.
There seems to be something always lacking in our lives (as fallen unregenerate men) which has prevented us from establishing and maintaining a righteous government. Perhaps we need to remember the Scripture that tells us that we know in part and we do in part, but until that which is perfect is come (1 Corinthians 13:10), we are not going to have the full measure of success that we desire in this life.
That is a major difference between us and those who teach that we are in the kingdom now. Some ministries preach that in the days ahead, man will be able to usher in the Kingdom of god. A feat that we might add, no previous generation of man has been able to accomplish in his present form, state, and existence. They believe that man will somehow get better, become more obedient to God, and that God Almighty will then use them through the leading of His Spirit to establish the Kingdom of God upon this earth.
Well, at least they have the correct location of the kingdom, instead of claiming that it is off in some nebulous outer space location! However, though we are "Heirs of the Promise," we like Abraham, must live by faith, and look for the promised "country" (kingdom), whose builder and maker is God.
These are the promises from the Word of God, TO THE OVERCOMERS. We are not born overcomers without lifting a finger, we become overcomers by yielding to Christ, and dying to self-will.� We will, also have to, like Paul; fight the good fight against Christ's enemies.
Christ told us that the Jews are the physical seedline descendants of Satan, through Cain, slew Abel; whom Christ labeled as being responsible for the shedding of all the innocent blood upon the earth; occupy that "GREAT CITY" JERUSALEM; and who are the enemy of our people {Jacob/Israel} and all of the other races on the earth.
Our position towards this enemy is very clearly shown in the Scriptures,
"...Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? Therefore is wrath upon thee from before God." (2 Chronicles 19:2)
"Do not I hate them, O God that hates thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies." (Psalm 139:21-22)
"I will lay my vengeance upon Edom {the Jews} by the hand of my people Israel." {Adamic race, the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob - Known to the world today as the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Celtic and kindred people of the western world}. (Ezekiel 25:14)
"The presence of the Jews in the midst of the European nations is a cause of many evils and a serious danger..." (Liszi, Franz, 19th century Hungarian Musician)
The Jew continues to monopolize money, and he frees or strangles the throat of the state with the loosening or tightening of his purse strings.� A veritable Pandora's box has been opened. The small industries and trade of bygone times have been replaced by the vast dealings of the banks, by the monstrous commerce of Finance, where with vertiginous rapidity, the Jew has become the autocrat-king and absolute lord.
He has invested himself fully with all the modern freedoms, the better to attack all Christians and Christian Truths; he has empowered himself with the engines of the press, which he uses to batter at the foundations of society.
Ezekiel 7:19-21: "They shall cast their silver in the streets, and their gold shall be removed: their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD: they shall not satisfy their souls, neither fill their bowels: because it is the stumbling block of their iniquity. As for the beauty of his ornament, he set it in majesty: but they made the images of their abominations and of their detestable things therein: therefore have I set it far from them. And I will give it into the hands of the strangers for a prey, and to the wicked of the earth for a spoil; and they shall pollute it."
They are found behind all social commotion, as they are at the bottom of all epidemics of immorality. They sell surreptitiously the crowbars and the projectiles that destroy the foundation of faith and morals.� They know well that no society can resist the potent degenerative force of immorality administered in adequate doses, bringing the enervation of complete intellectual abasement. (Die Israeliten - Editor William Grimstad's comments).
Rue Lafitte (No. 21) is the address of Banque Rothschild, then as now one of the several headquarters of Jewish International Finance. In point of fact, however, something rather graphically opposite to destruction did happen there in the Red Revolution of 1848, when the mob systematically looted and burned much of the rest of Paris, but left all palaces and banks of Rothschild and his cohorts miraculously untouched.
This probably had something to do with the fact that James Rothschild was the major financier of the Communists. Liszis observation of Jewish involvement in the smut industry is so self-evident as scarcely to need comment.� Without getting into the very lengthy listing of names and facts that could easily be written, it should suffice merely to point to the early-day "big three" of pornography in America: Samuel Roth, Ralph Ginzburg and Barney Rosset.
All were among the first publishers, and all mounted expensive court actions that ultimately culminated in the dropping of effective legal barriers to the filth-tide that now engulf America.
The Jew's Babylonian Talmud enjoys portraying Jesus as a fool in the most humiliating of circumstances. The unedited editions of Sanhedrin 107b say that Jesus was excommunicated for the thought of seducing a woman, and in his ensuing grief and confusion fell down and started worshiping a brick.
�Such degradation was, however, but the beginning of His disgrace. The Jewish Encyclopedia continues: "Jesus is accordingly in the following curious Talmudic legend thought to sojourn in hell. A certain Onkelos B. Kalonilos, son of Tiut's sister desired to embrace Judaism, and called up from hell by magic first Titus, then Balaam, and finally Jesus, who are here taken as the worst enemies of Judaism. He asked Jesus: 'Who is esteemed in that world?' Jesus said: 'Israel.' 'Shall one join them?' Jesus said to him: 'Further their well being do nothing to their detriment; whoever touches them touches the apple of His eyes. Onkelos then asked the nature of his punishment, and was told that it was the degrading fate of those who mock the wise.'" (Git. 56b-57a)
The degrading fate of those who mock the wise becomes horribly apparent in the actual text of the Talmud. "He said: What is your punishment? They replied with boiling hot excrement, since a Master has said: Whoever mocks at the words of the Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement." (Git. 56b)
THROWN OUT: Jews have claimed over and over at every opportunity that they have been innocent victims of anti-Semitism time and time again. They are always portrayed on television and in the movies as being guilty of no wrong doing, desiring only to practice their faith, and make an honest living. An inquiring mind cannot help but wonder that, if this is the case; that the Jews are innocent, why have the Jews been the brunt of persecution so many times without cause?
Expulsions of Jews from Host Nations: 1). A.D. 250, Carthage; 2). 415, Alexandria; 3). 554, Diocese of Clement (France); 4). 561, Diocese of Uzzes (France); 5). 612, Visigoth Spain; 6). 642, Visigoth Empire; 7). 855, Italy; 8). 876, Sens; 9). 1012, Mayence; 10). 1181, France; 11). 1290, England; 12). 1306, France; 13). 1348, Switzerland; 14). 1349, Hielbronn (Germany); 15). 1349, Hungary; 16). 1388, Strasbourg; 17). 1394, Germany; 18). 1394, France; 19). 1422, Austria; 20). 1424, Fribourg & Zurich; 21). 1426, Cologne; 22). 1432, Savory; 23). 1438, Mainz; 24). 1439, Augsburg; 25). 1446, Bavaria; 26). 1453, Franconis; 27). 1453, Breslau; 28). 1454, Wurzburg; 29). 1485, Vincenza (Italy); 30). 1492, Spain; 31). 1495, Lithuania; 32). 1497, Portugal; 33). 1499, Germany; 34). 1514, Strasbourg; 35). 1519, Regensburg; 36). 1540, Naples; 37). 1542, Bohemia; 38). 1550, Genoa; 39). 1551, Bavaria; 40). 1555, Pesaro; 41). 1559, Austria; 42). 1561, Prague; 43). 1567, Wurzburg, Genoese Republic; 44). 1569, Papal States; 45). 1571, Brandenburg; 46). 1582, Netherlands; 47). 1593, Brandenburg, Austria; 48). 1597, Cremona, Pavia & Lodi; 49). 1614, Frankfort; 50). 1615, Worms; 51). 1619, Kiev; 52). 1649, Ukraine; 53). 1654, LittleRussia; 54). 1656, Lithuania; 55). 1669, Oran (North Africa); 56). 1670, Vienna; 57). 1712, Sandomir; 58). 1727, Russia; 59). 1738, Wurtemburg; 60). 1740, LittleRussia; 61). 1744, Bohemia; 62). 1744, Livonia; 63). 1745, Moravia; 64). 1753, Kovad (Lithuania); 65). 1761, Bordeaux; 66). 1772, Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia); 67). 1775, Warsaw; 68). 1789, Alace; 69). 1804, Villages in Russia; 70). 1808, Villages & Countrysides (Russia); 71). 1815, Lubeck & Bremen; 72). 1815, Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria; 73). 1820, Bremes; 74). 1843, Russian Border Austria & Prussia; 75). 1862, Area in the U.S. under Grant's Jurisdiction; 76). 1866, Galatz, Romania; 77). 1919, Bavaria (foreign born Jews); 78). 1938-45, Nazi Controlled Areas; 79). 1948, Arab Countries. (International Jewish Encyclopedia).
If a man were accused of a serious crime and tried and found guilty by a jury of his peers, we would find but little cause to put faith in a claim by him of persecution. However if he insisted that this was exactly the case, and that only because he believed differently than others was he charged of misconduct, then we might grant him a second trial to assure ourselves he had not been the victim of misjustice, believing with confidence that the people would not a second time find an innocent party guilty of crime that he did not commit.
If, at the conclusion of the second trial by another jury of peers, the man is found guilty of an offense against the people, we have no reason to listen to or place belief in continued cries of persecution. What does this have to do with the Jew? Quite simple.
Since the year 250 A.D., the Jews have, by their own records and count, been expelled from eighty-one (81) countries, nations, or political entities. Let's see now. Eighty-one countries, eighty-one people's courts, eighty-one guilty verdicts, and eighty-one cries of persecution.
The first time, maybe. The second time doubtful. But eighty-one times to have been found worthy of expulsion for crimes against the people of the countries they were in at the time? Such a claim stretches the limits of human credulity beyond its most liberal bounds of endurance. Methinks the Jew doeth protest to much.
When one comes to the realization of the fact that these different peoples in most cases did not know of each other, or for that matter had not even heard of the others existence, and yet determined, independently, over a two thousand year span of time that the Jews were committing such serious crimes that it was necessary to uproot them lock, stock and barrel in order to drive them from their homes, many times with loss of life and great destruction of property, it is then and only then, that a true appreciation of the Jewish question is obtained.
If you are a thinking person, consider also the following, for it is just such traitorous actions which has caused their expulsions: "Why should we believe in God? WE [Jews] HATE CHRISTIANITY AND CHRISTIANS. Even the best of them must be regarded as our worst enemies. They preach love of one's neighbor, and pity, WHICH IS CONTRARY TO OUR PRINCIPLES. Christian love is a hindrance to the revolution. Down with love of one's neighbor; what we want is hatred. We must know how to hate, for only at this price can we conquer the universe...The fight should also be developed in the Moslem and Catholic countries, with the same ends in view and by the same means." (Rabbi Lunat Charski, quoted in The Jewish Assault on Christianity, page 44)
�The strongest supporters of Judaism cannot deny that JUDAISM IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN!" (Jewish World, March 15, 1924)
"ONE OF THE FINEST THINGS EVER DONE BY THE MOB WAS THE CRUCIFIXION OF CHRIST. Intellectually it was a splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle the job. If I'd had charge of executing Christ, I'd have handled it differently. You see, what I'd have done WAS HAD HIM SHIPPED TO ROME AND FED HIM TO THE LIONS. THEY COULD NEVER HAVE MADE A SAVIOR OUT OF MINCEMEAT!" (Rabbi Ben Hecht)
"Judaism and Christianity are two worlds, BETWEEN YOU CHRISTIANS AND US JEWS THERE LIES AN UNBRIDGEABLE GULF...There are two life forces in the world: Jewish and non-Jewish...I do not believe this primal difference between Christians and Jews is reconcilable...The difference between us is abysmal...You might say: 'Well, let us exist side by side and tolerate each other. We will not attack your morality, nor you ours.' But the misfortune is that the two are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. No man can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other." (Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, pages 9, 19, 23, 30 and 95)
The Rabbis of Judaism understand this just as do the leaders in the Christian movement. Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National Jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term Judeo-Christian was relatively new, "THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RELIGION. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other." (National Jewish Information Service, 6412 W. Olympic Blvd. L.A. CA)
Methods for controlling society have existed for centuries. Late in the 18th century the Illuminati {Highest Degree of Freemasonry}, a European, international secret society, combined many of these ideas into a long range master plan. The new society would be ruled by the Illuminati {Jewish} elite and their associates.� Today evidence points to core leaders of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral Commission, among others, are using these techniques to bring about elitist control and management of the world.� Consider the history and purposes of the CFR founded in 1921 by Colonel Edward Mandel House {Jew} - Advisor to President Woodrow Wilson {Jew} as part of a project begun in the 1880s by the British colonialist Cecil Rhodes {Jew}.
The model for the CFR was the Royal Institute of International Affairs, founded in 1919 {for the Rothchild [Jewish] banking interests} with money from the Rhodes Trust. The seeds of both institutions were planted during the Paris peace conference in 1919 {at the end of World War I between Germany and the Allies}. Representatives of the British Round Table met with several highly placed Americans.
The American group returned to the United States from the meeting and incorporated the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 under the direction of House. Like the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Council is related to the doctrine bequeathed in the 1877 will of Cecil Rhodes to: "Establish a trust to, and for, the establishment and promotion and development of a secret society, the true aim and object whereof shall be the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom and the colonization by British subjects of all lands...especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Island of Cyprus, and Candia (Crete), the whole of South America, the islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, THE ULTIMATE RECOVERY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE..."
The Royal Institute of International Affairs is that "secret society," The Council on Foreign Relations is its parallel in the United States and its goals are the same, the development of an elitist managed, humanistic, global economy and social order {NEW WORLD ORDER}.
Mandel House espoused Marxism and Communism and he played the same government role for President Wilson as Kissinger {Jew} did for Presidents Nixon and Ford, and Brzezinski {Jew} for President Carter. (Rocky Mountain News, Tuesday, December 9, 1980) Both Kissinger and Brzezinski served as head of National Security: They control the FBI, CIA, Defense Intelligence, Army and Navy Intelligence, Air force Intelligence, and State Department Intelligence: Are we safe? Not on your life!
Benjamin Disraeli {Former Jewish Prime Minister of England}, who at one time was the most powerful man in Britain and whose real name was Israel, published his book "Coningsby" in which he says: "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene."
The Jews have been responsible for the death of untold millions of Israelites over the centuries since the Birth, Death, and Resurrection of our Kinsman Redeemer, and King, Yeashua the Savior, and for centuries before as is related in the Book of Obadiah.
�The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord GOD concerning Edom; We have heard a rumour from the LORD, and an ambassador is sent among the heathen, Arise ye, and let us rise up against her in battle. Behold, I have made thee small among the heathen: THOU ART GREATLY DESPISED. The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground? Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars (Among the Israelites; Genesis 37:9), thence will I (will) BRING THEE DOWN, saith the LORD. If thieves came to thee, if robbers by night, (how art thou cut off!) would they not have stolen till they had enough? if the grapegatherers came to thee, would they not leave some grapes? How are the things of Esau (Edom; and Edom is in modern Jewry; There is Edom [Esau is called Edom in Genesis 36:8. And Edom is in 'Modern Jewry' Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41)searched out! how are his hidden things sought up! ALL THE MEN OF THY CONFEDERACY HAVE BROUGHT THEE EVEN TO THE BORDER: THE MEN THAT WERE AT PEACE WITH THEE HAVE DECEIVED THEE, and PREVAILED AGAINST THEE; they that eat thy bread have laid a wound under thee: there is none understanding in him. SHALL I NOT IN THAT DAY (The day of the Lord), saith the LORD, EVEN DESTROY THE WISE MEN OUT OF EDOM, and UNDERSTANDING OUT OF THE MOUNT OF ESAU? And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, TO THE END THAT EVERY ONE OF THE MOUNT OF ESAU MAY BE CUT OFF BY SLAUGHTER (Here is a witness that the Jews will be cut off and slaughtered on the day of the Lord). For THY VIOLENCE AGAINST THY BROTHER JACOB SHAME SHALL COVER THEE, and THOU SHALT BE CUT OFF FOR EVER (Here is the second witness that the Jews will be utterly destroyed). IN THE DAY THAT THOU STOODEST ON THE OTHER SIDE, IN THE DAY THAT THE STRANGERS CARRIED AWAY CAPTIVE HIS FORCES, and FOREIGNERS ENTERED INTO HIS GATES, and CAST LOTS UPON JERUSALEM, EVEN THOU WAST AS ONE OF THEM. But THOU SHOULDEST NOT HAVE LOOKED ON THE DAY OF THY BROTHER IN THE DAY THAT HE BECAME A STRANGER; NEITHER SHOULDEST THOU HAVE REJOICED OVER THE CHILDREN OF JUDAH IN THE DAY OF THEIR DESTRUCTION; NEITHER SHOULDEST THOU HAVE SPOKEN PROUDLY IN THE DAY OF DISTRESS. THOU SHOULDEST NOT HAVE ENTERED INTO THE GATE OF MY PEOPLE (Israel) IN THE DAY OF THEIR CALAMITY; yea, THOU SHOULDEST NOT HAVE LOOKED ON THEIR AFFLICTION IN THE DAY OF THEIR CALAMITY, NOR HAVE LAID HANDS ON THEIR SUBSTANCE IN THE DAY OF THEIR CALAMITY; NEITHER SHOULDEST THOU HAVE STOOD IN THE CROSSWAY, TO CUT OFF THOSE OF HIS THAT DID ESCAPE; NEITHER SHOULDEST THOU HAVE DELIVERED UP THOSE OF HIS THAT DID REMAIN IN THE DAY OF DISTRESS. For the day of the LORD is near upon all the heathen: AS THOU (You Jews) HAST DONE, IT SHALL BE DONE UNTO THEE: thy reward shall return upon thine own head. For as ye have drunk upon my holy mountain, so shall all the heathen drink continually, yea, they shall drink, and they shall swallow down, and THEY (The Jews) SHALL BE AS THOUGH THEY HAD NOT BEEN (Here is the third witness that the Jews will be totally destroyed).� But upon mount Zion shall be deliverance, and there shall be holiness; and the house of Jacob shall possess their possessions. And THE HOUSE OF JACOB SHALL BE A FIRE, and THE HOUSE OF JOSEPH A FLAME, and THE HOUSE OF ESAU FOR STUBBLE, and THEY SHALL KINDLE IN THEM, and DEVOUR THEM; and THERE SHALL NOT BE ANY REMAINING OF THE HOUSE OF ESAU (Here is a fourth witness that the Jews will be utterly and completely destroyed); for the LORD hath spoken it. And they of the south shall possess the mount of Esau; and they of the plain the Philistines: and they shall possess the fields of Ephraim, and the fields of Samaria: and Benjamin shall possess Gilead. And the captivity of this host of the children of Israel shall possess that of the Canaanites, even unto Zarephath; and the captivity of Jerusalem, which is in Sepharad, shall possess the cities of the south. And saviours shall come up on mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau; and the kingdom shall be the LORD's.� (Obadiah 1:1‑21)
When I relate that most of the people, known to the world today, are Khazars; some people come back and say the Khazars did not become Jews until around 700 A.D., so who were the Jews of Christ�s time on earth?
The answer is that there were many mixbreeds, where True Israelites married into the other races of the people indigenous to the area of Palestine before Christ was Born, Buried and Raised again as the Redeemer and Savior of His Israel people. Following is a short study on this; and of course it could be expanded into several volumes, but if the following is not sufficient to demonstrate how the Jews came into being, before the time of Christ, then a thousand volumes would not be sufficient either. For there are always among us a group of people who will not believe anything, anyone says; and no amount of documentation will suffice for them. For they will simply dismiss it after it is furnished to them, and they continue to believe the falsehoods which were taught to them by their teachers who have itching ears and etc.
�The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?� (Jeremiah 5:31)
���������������������������������� THE SHELAH CONNECTION
To understand that the Pharisees at the time of Christ and those of Jewry in the 20th century are at least partial descendants of the children of the flesh, we must go back and begin with Judah, Jacob's 4th son of Leah and his descendants. The story of Judah's marriage and descendants is recorded in Genesis, Chapter 38.
Genesis, Chapter 37 ends with Joseph being sold into Egypt and the story of Joseph starts again in Chapter 39. It is both interesting and strange that Chapter 38 should be placed at this particular place in the Scriptures about a subject totally unrelated to the former and latter chapters.
We are told in verse 1 that Judah "went down from his brethren." This appears to have been an act of poor judgement such as later Dinah exhibited and was raped due to her poor judgement. We are not told the reason for Judah's poor judgement but it begins the history of conflict between Judah and his brothers which will continue till the later separation of the nation into the House of Israel and the House of Judah.
Judah, being separated from his family ties, could and did fall prey to the women in the land who were not his kinsmen according to the flesh. We are told that Judah: "...saw there a daughter of a certain Canaanite, whose name was Shuah; and he took her, and went in unto her."
This connection was contrary to the will of God and Judah should have known better from his upbringing if not the example of his fathers. His indiscretion or poor judgement in forming an alliance with the people in the land was a crime that produced bastard children. If this bastardization of Israel was to continue the chosen people would soon be assimilated into surrounding heathenism and would no longer be God's chosen people. Thus we see the necessity for God to separate His people from these heathen peoples.
In any event Judah took a Canaanite for a wife and had three bastard sons {sons born from mixed seed}: Er, Onan, and Shelah. We say bastard sons because in the Old Testament a bastard was a child born from a mixed marriage with an Israelite and another race (see Strong's Concordance). When the time came that Er, Judah's eldest son, was to have a wife, Judah obtained for him a woman named Tamar.
We are not told how or why, but Er was "wicked in the sight of the Lord" (Genesis 38:7) and the Lord slew him. We are not told what this wickedness was but the word used here also means evil and mischief and these definitions lead many to believe this evil had something to do with the law. Being raised by his Canaanite mother, he would have become indoctrinated in the ways of the pagan Canaanites ‑ not the ways of the Lord.
According to the law, Onan, Er's younger brother, had to marry Tamar and raise up seed to his elder brother, Er. However, Onan was wicked also, and refused to do this, spilling his seed on the ground (Genesis 38:9). This was probably because of the threat of losing the inheritance {that is, he would be raising up seed for his brother}, again, possibly from the training he received from his Canaanite mother.
In any event, God also slew Onan. Once again, according to the law Tamar should have been given to the third son, Shelah, that he might raise up sons for his elder brother. However, by this time Judah must have been just a little bit concerned. After all, Tamar had already been the wife of two of his sons and both had been killed by the Lord. Thus it is easy to understand his reluctance. Scripture tells us that Judah told Tamar to wait until Shelah was older; however, when he got older Judah failed or refused to give Tamar to Shelah. Tamar waited and waited but Shelah eventually took another for a wife, apparently with his father's blessing.
It is recorded in the 45th chapter of the book of Jasher that Tamar was a daughter from the genealogy of Elam, the son of Shem. That she was a daughter of Shem makes sense in view of what Judah said when he found out she was pregnant with child. Scripture records that it was reported to Judah that: "Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt."
Stoning was the normal mode of capital punishment at that time in history ‑ death by fire was not the normal procedure used to execute someone. Therefore it is significant that Judah pronounced death by burning for that was reserved for priests' daughters who brought disgrace upon the sacred office. The law states: "And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire."
Since Judah pronounced death by fire we are able to conclude that she must have been the daughter of a priest. However, one would think that if she was, she should be aware of the law prohibiting mixed marriages. But perhaps that was not the case.
Tamar could have been imported from another geographical area as was Rebecca for Isaac. Thus at the time of her arrival and marriage to Er and Onan she could have been unaware of the covenant God had made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel. Not being aware of the covenant she would not know that the two men she married were half Canaanite and half Israelite and not legitimate heirs to the promise.
By the time Shelah had taken another wife, Tamar was probably educated in the covenant relationship with God and realized that even if she was given to Shelah, any sons from that union would not produce a bloodline heir. This is about the only logical reason for her to play the harlot, entrapping Judah to become the father of her children (Pharez and Zerah) at the risk of being put to fiery death. It would also partially explain Judah's response when he found out that he was the father and stated: "She is more righteous than I; forasmuch as I gave her not to Shelah my son."
Although Judah may not have totally understood or admitted that his marriage to a Canaanite was in violation of the law, he is, at least, acknowledging that Tamar should have been the mother of children of the birthright. He must have understood this birthright problem sooner or later, as the scepter was not passed to Shelah, Judah's third and only surviving son from Shuah, but to Judah's firstborn son from Tamar who was named Pharez. This is evidenced by the fact that Pharez's name appears in the genealogies of Christ in Matthew 1:3 and Luke 3:23.
The union of Judah with Tamar produced the twin births of Pharez and Zerah, and once again Judah had three sons: 1). Shelah, who was a bastard {� Canaanite & � of Judah} by his Canaanite wife; 2). Pharez; and 3). Zerah, the latter two both from Tamar. Pharez and Zerah being the sons of Judah, the son of Jacob/Israel, and Tamar the daughter of the genealogy of Shem, were full‑blooded Israelites even though they were born out of wedlock. The whole story is recorded in Genesis 38. These births produced three descendant lines from Judah which we will call Pharez‑Judah, Zerah‑Judah, and Shelah‑Judah.
The question now becomes, what happened to the three descendants of Judah: Pharez, Zerah and Shelah? It will simply be stated at this point in the study that Pharez and Zerah were children of the promise whereas Shelah was a child of the flesh and destined to become the father of the Pharisees. This study will not be concerned with Pharez and Zerah ‑ only the family of Shelah will be addressed.
�������������������������������������������� SHELAH-JUDAH
We need to keep in mind the fact that a strict genealogy was kept on each tribe. Even though Shelah was a bastard son of Judah, his genealogy is given in Scripture and his descendants can be traced to the city of Elath. In Chronicles it is recorded: "The sons of Judah; Er, and Onan, and Shelah: which three were born unto him of the daughter of Shua the Canaanite. And Er, the firstborn of Judah, was evil in the sight of the LORD; and he slew him. And Tamar his daughter in law bare him Pharez and Zerah. All the sons of Judah were five. The sons of Pharez; Hezron, and Hamul. And the sons of Zerah; Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara: five of them in all. And the sons of Carmi; Achar, the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed. And the sons of Ethan; Azariah."
Verse 3 is unusual, as once a name is dropped from the promised seed line it usually does not appear in later genealogies. For example the descendants of Cain do not appear in the genealogies of Adam in Genesis, Chapter 5, or Matthew 1 or Luke 3. It is difficult to determine exactly when the Book of Chronicles was written, however verse 1 of chapter 9 states: "So all Israel were reckoned by genealogies; and, behold, they were written in the book of the kings of Israel and Judah, who were carried away to Babylon for their transgression."
Some remark that the Scriptures state: �Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.� (1 Timothy 1:4) Then piously think that is the end of the discussion about the genealogies of our ancestors.
But that is not true, Thayer�s Definition relates what this means: #3454� muthos‑1) a speech, a word, a saying; 2) a narrative, story: a) a true narrative; b) a fiction, a fable, an invention, a falsehood. So don�t argue with the Jews about the genealogies because they will return with fables, or an invention, a falsehood, and etc.
For God told us in Isaiah 51:1‑2: �Hearken to me, ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the LORD: look unto the rock whence ye are hewn, and to the hole of the pit whence ye are digged. Look unto Abraham your father, and unto Sarah that bare you: for I called him alone, and blessed him, and increased him.� Therefore, we are to look backward through the ages and genealogies to Abraham and Sarah, our original mother and father. But we are not to argue with the Jews or non-believers as they will ask one question after another and every answer one gives them opens up to yet another question; so much so that there would never be an end, and the Word of God would be sacrificed during the conversation. Which was the plan of the Jews in the beginning.
Since the first 8 chapters deal with the genealogies of Adam to this statement in verse 1 of chapter 9, which refers to the Babylonian captivity, it seems apparent that this portion of Chronicles was not recorded until sometime after the Babylonian captivity (600 B.C.) ‑ perhaps by Ezra or Nehemiah.
Again, all of Judah's sons must be important or they would not be recorded in Scripture, especially since the descendants of Shelah were not children of the promise. It should be noted that verses 5 and 6 list the descendants of Pharez and Zerah, and verse 8 begins with Ethan, a son of Zerah.
What is missing here are the sons of Shelah. But verse 7 seems to be completely out of place as it lists the genealogy of a person named "Carmi." Carmi is not one of the five sons of Judah, nor is he listed in the Genealogies of Pharez or Zerah. The name also appears in 1 Chronicles 4:1, but it is still unclear whose son he was. However, it is most interesting that his son "Achar" is referred to as "the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed."� While it appears impossible to prove it, it is suggested that "Carmi" and his son "Achar," the troubler of Israel, were in the genealogy of Shelah.
We mentioned that these names were also listed in Chronicles, chapter 4, as follows: "The sons of Shelah the son of Judah were, Er the father of Lecah, and laadah the father of Maresbah, and the families of the house of them that wrought fine linen, of the house of Ashbea, And Jokim, and the men of Chozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had the dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. And these are ancient things. These were the potters, and those that dwelt among plants and hedges; thee they dwell with the king for his work."
Again there is no mention of "Carmi" nor his son "Achar," but her we do have a reference to these descendants of Shelah being "men of Chozeba." Chozeba was a town in southwestern Judah and is also the town of Chezib of Genesis 38:5 and Achzib of Joshua 15:44. The words Chezib, Achzib or Chozeba mean "lying," "deceptive," "disappointing," or "failing." It is also interesting that Shelah‑Judah was born in Chezib (Genesis 38:5) and it� appears that his descendants centuries later inherited this same city.
In Joshua we find that: "This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah by their families; even to the border of Edom the wilderness of Zin southward was the utter most part of the south coast. And Keilab, and Achzib, and Mareshah; nine cities with their villages."
Thus we see that the town of "Achzib" was given to some descendants of Judah. Achzib or Chozeba was located in the valley of Elath. Elath was in Old Edom in the valley of Elath and north of Adullum. The word "Adullum" should ring a bell as that was the place where Judah went down from his brothers and took a Canaanite for a wife. This was on the extreme southern border of the Southern Kingdom of Judah at the northern end of the Gulf of Aquabah.
In fact most scholars seem to be in agreement that this area was actually outside the land inherited by Judah. This would make some sense as we know that a bastard could not even enter the congregation, even unto the tenth generation ; therefore it would also make sense that these Shelahites, being bastards, could not inherit land belonging to the children of the promise. But this does not mean that they could not be given land on the southern border of Judah.
The city of Elath was next to Ezion‑geber, which would later become Solomon's seaport. Remember now that these Shelahites are � Canaanite, and the word Canaanite is defined in Strong's Concordance as merchants and traders. Doesn't it seem logical that merchants and traders would congregate in the cities, and especially in and around a busy seaport where they could engage in trade, commerce, and industry?
There is another reference to this city named "Achzib" in the Book of Micah where it states: "The house of Achzib shall be a lie to the kings of Israel."
Is it just a coincidence that Shelah was born at "Chezib" which is basically the same word as Achzib? Is it coincidence that the word "Achzib so closely resembles and has the same meaning as "Achar," the troubler of Israel? Remember these words mean "lying," "deceptive," "disappointing," or "falling." Was it not a lie that Shelah was a true child of the promise? Would not their existence next to and/or as a part of Israel make any claim they would make as being a descendant of Abraham,� entitled to receive the promises, a lie or at the least a clever deception?
���������������������������������������� JEWS FROM ELATH
Elath or Eloth was a part of the land of Edom belonging to the descendants of Esau who were called Edomites an later Idumeans. Apparently Elath and Ezion‑geber came under the control of Israel in 1040 B.C. by David's conquest of Edom as recorded in 2 Samuel 8:13‑14. This land is also mentioned as being under the rule of Solomon in approximately 1000 B.C.� The land passed back into Edomite control in 890 B.C. during the days of Jehoarm, king of Judah.� 80 years later in 810 B.C., the city of Elath was rebuilt� under the kingship of Azariah or Uszziah.
This historical background brings us to the time of the "Jews from Elath" as recorded in 2 Kings, Chapter 16, which states: "In the seventeenth year of Pekah the son of Remaliah Ahaz the son of Jotham king of Judah began to reign. Then Rezin king of Syria and Pekah son of Remaliah king of Israel came up to Jerusalem to war; and they besieged Ahaz, but could over come him. At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath..."
Keep in mind that the time frame is approximately 750 B.C., which is around 200 years after the split of Israel into the Houses of Judah and Israel in 975 B.C., and just before the beginning of the Assyrian captivity in 721‑745 B.C.
By this time Jotham was the king of Judah {the two southern tribes of Judah and Benjamin}, and Pekah was the king of Israel {the 10 northern tribes}.It is the king of Syria, and Pekah, the king of Israel {not Judah}, who formed an alliance and went� to war against the House of Judah. During that war they were unable to take Jerusalem, but Rezin, king of Syria, was able to recover the city of Elath and "drave the Jews from Elath."
As previously stated, Elath was far south of the area inherited by Judah and was given to Shelah as an inheritance. Again this was probably done because as a bastard, he could not enter the congregation of Israel nor inherit with the children of Israel. Remember, these people were part Canaanite, and in Strong's Concordance the word "Canaanite" means merchants and traders. Merchants cannot be merchants except in populated areas and therefore would have a propensity to migrate towards the cities, so it is logical to conclude that they were the ones who resided in Elath and were driven there‑from.
It was from this area called Elath, and this area alone, that Rezin "drave the Jews." Ahaz, king of Judah {Southern Kingdom}, was still in Jerusalem and was never defeated nor was he driven anywhere. Pekah, king of Israel {Northern Kingdom}, apparently returned home. Therefore, whatever "Jews" were driven from Elath were only a small portion of people located South of Judah ‑ not all of the House of Judah, and none of the House of Israel. Therefore, the word "Jews," as used in this verse does not include any people from the House of Israel and probably none from the House of Judah. This limits the use of the word "Jew" in the Old Testament to a very small group of people who resided in the town of Elath, who were most likely descendants of Shelah.
Scripture does not tell us where these so‑called "Jews from Elath" went after being driven from Elath, but being traders and merchants they would be city dwellers, and it is probably safe to assume that they moved north to the walled city of Jerusalem. After Rezin "drave the Jews" from Elath the area was again populated but this time by Edomites.
The word "Jews" is used for the first time in Scripture in the King James Authorized (KJA) version in this verse. If you own a 1592 copy of the Geneva Bible, or a 1611 King James version and will open it to this verse you will not find the word "Jew."
According to the Jewish Encyclopedia: "Up to the seventeenth century this word was spelled in the Middle English in various ways:...Ieue, Ieu, Iwe, Iewe, Iue... corresponding to the Hebrew...a gentile adjective from the proper name 'Judah' seemingly never a;;lied to member of the tribe {of Judah}, however, but to members of the nationality inhabiting the South of Palestine. It appears to have been afterward extended to apply to Israelites in the North..."
If you will once again look at 2 Kings 16:6 in an original 1611 KJA version, you will find one of these words ‑ You will not find the word "Jews." And probably more interesting in this quote is the fact that the word "Ieue,' etc., was never applied to the tribe of Judah but to a nationality "inhabiting the South of Palestine." The encyclopedia fails to point out who these people were but it has previously been shown that the land South of Judah was occupied by the Shelah branch of Judah ‑ a bastard son from his Canaanite wife.
According to Biblical scholar Alexander Schiffner: "The first reference to any Jews in Scripture is found in 2 Kings 16:6. The name was applied to a remnant of Judah's descendants of the Shelah Branch. Shelah‑Judah was born in Chezib� and his descendants centuries later inherited his territory.� Remember a strict genealogy was kept of each tribe and branch.
Chezib,� Achzib and Chozeba� refer to one and the same place. it was a town in the lowlands of western Judah and was given to the Shelah branch of Judah for their inheritance. This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah by their families.'� The word Chezib, Achzh or Chozeba means 'deceptive' or 'failing' and the place received its name from a winter spring or brook, which failed in the summer heat. {Symbolic of the failing of the Shela branch of Judah under trial}. It was the place where Judah was at the time of the birth of his half‑breed son, Shelah.
In 1 Chronicles 4:21‑22 it is called 'Chozeba.' it is in the valley of Elath and north of Addulum. Note 2 Kings 16:6 ‑ the first reference to this branch of Judah; 'the Jews of Elath.' The Jews are the remnant' of 'Yehudim' of Judah. This branch of Judah rejected Christ. They are the open witness, 'The shew of their countenance doth witness against them ‑ their tongue and their doings are against the Lord ‑ they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not.'."
James Fox, the author of several books, wrote of Shelah: "The reason for the divergence of facial appearance between the true Hebrew or Abrahamic White‑Race Men, and the Jews, is that the patriarch Judah disobeyed God's will at the outset by marrying a Canaanitish woman called 'Shua,' producing descendants all half‑castes, later known as 'Jews.'
According to these authors, the "Jews of Elath" were the 'remnant' of 'Yehudim' of Judah, and verses 5 and 6 of 2 Kings, chapter 16, are the first reference to the mongrel Canaanite branch of Judah where they are referred to as "Jews" . The use of the word "Jews" in 2 Kings 16:6 rather than "Ieues" has added to the misconception that the Jews are all of Israel, when it is obvious that in this verse only a small group of people were implied ‑ those living in Elath ‑ which omits the entire northern ten tribes and the majority of the House of Judah.
The major problem with the Jew in Anytown USA's conversations is that the word carries so many definitions and so few seem very want to know fully what he is really talking about or referring to when he uses the term "Jew."
Most so‑called (c)hristians of today, even those who are of Israelite stock, and are not aware of it, don't want to hear the words, concepts and truth contained in this study. Those of Israelite heritage may find some fulfillment in Jeremiah's words, found in Chapter 5:30‑31 which sound all too familiar: "A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land; The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so; and what will ye do in the end thereof?"
Some think that the King James Version is the only correct version. This version was written in 1611, but it for sure contains some errors. Look at John 4:22, where Christ tells the woman of Samari: "Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship; for salvation is of the Jews." This is a primary script for the problem we face today, for any discerning true Christian Israelite should see this is not a true statement, but rather a false one based on its own merits.
Any Christian should realize the truth that salvation does not come through any religion or any race of people, but through Jesus the Christ. The Ferrar Fenton version, which comes from the original Greek text, says: "the salvation comes from among the Judeans." Now which way should we Israelites come to know fully the truth of this verse? If Christ came out of the region of Judea and the Hebrew tribe of Judah, then He is the way, the truth and the life.
Paul planted the first Christian Church in Corinth, teaching that Christ is the Salvation for HIS people. But we hear the resounding common statement, but Pontius Pilate said that He was "King of the Jews." But did he really say that as most, deceived, Judeo‑Christians believe?
There are some who say, "Thank God! My Savior Was Not A Jew!," that there is a historical record found in the Achoko Volume in the Congressional Library in Washington, D.C., containing an official record of one of Pilate's correspondences.
He states on pages 137‑139: "The Archoko record gives an eye‑witness account from Pontius Pilate, who testified that Jesus did not look like, or act like a Jew. Here is the account as it appears in this official record: To Tiberius Caesar, Emperor of Rome Noble Sovereign, Greetings: '...Among various rumors that came to my ears there was one in particular that came to my attention. A young man it was said, had appeared in Galilee, preaching with noble unction a new law in the name of the God who sent him. At first I was apprehensive that his design was to stir up the people against the Romans, but my fears were soon dispelled.
Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day in passing by the place of Siloe, where there was a great concourse of people, I observed in the midst of the group a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected, so great was the difference between him and those who listened to him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance an almost celestial aspect. He appeared to be about thirty years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between he and his hearers with their black beards and tawny complexions!...
Never have I heard in the words of the philosopher, anything that can compare with the maxims of Jesus. One of the rebellious Jews, so numerous in Jerusalem, asked Jesus if it was lawful to give tribute to Caesar, he replied: 'Render unto Caesar the things which belong to Caesar, and unto God the things which are God's...
I wrote to Jesus requesting an interview with him at the praetorium and he came." (Think now for a moment on your own, without having some Judeo‑Christian preacher tell you that this is fantasy. What would be so strange in this? Even though this meeting is not recorded in the Gospels, we know that most of what Christ did during His three years of public ministry was never recorded.
Pilate's report to Caesar continues: 'You know that in my veins flows the Spanish mixed with Roman blood...When the Nazarene made his appearance, I was walking in my basilic, and my feet seemed fastened with an iron hand to the marble pavement, and I trembled in every limb as does a guilty culprit, though the Nazarene was as calm as innocence itself. When he came up to me and stopped, and by a signal sign seemed to say to me, 'I am here!' though he spoke not a word. For some time I contemplated with admiration and awe, this extraordinary type of man, a type unknown to our numerous painter...There was nothing about him that was repelling in its character and I felt awed and tremulous to approach him.
Jesus, I said to him at last, 'Jesus of Nazareth, for the last three years I have granted you ample freedom of speech nor do I regret it. Your words are those of a sage. I know not whether you have read Socrates or Plato, but this I know, there is in your discourse a majestic simplicity that elevates you above those philosophers...'your blood shall not be spilled,' I said, with deep emotion, 'you are more precious in my estimation on account of your wisdom than all the turbulent and proud Pharisees who abuse the freedoms granted them by Rome. They conspire against Caesar, and convert his bounty into fear, impressing on the unlearned, that Caesar is a tyrant who seeks their ruin...I will protect you against them. My praetorium shall be an asylum both day and night.' I am our obedient servant, Pontius Pilate."
You can accept this letter, as we do, since it makes sense, or dismiss it as most of your Judeo‑Christian preachers and church Bible scholars will do. But, think for yourself! Doesn't it make sense to you that the Jews would try and suppress this truth?
There is one point in the aforementioned passage of Acts 18 that most folks seem to over look. Paul came to Corinth and planted the first Christian Church with the True Israelite inhabitants who apparently were worshiping Judaism out of ignorance. With little success at first, but a s a rational, as well as spiritual preacher, Paul reasoned with all Jews (Both non‑Israel and True Israel) not with force or violence but by fair arguing he won some over to his own opinion.
In verses 9 and 10, Paul had a vision. Each of us ought to know fully this vision and effectively grasp its meaning in our lives, today, as White Israelites. We read in the King James Version: "Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace: For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city."
We should renew our own commission "be not afraid of the Jews." That means be not afraid of the magistrates of the city, county, state or federal for they have no power against you but what is given them from above. We are pleading, like Paul, the cause of heaven and we need to do it boldly. We should not be afraid of their words, nor dismayed at their quirky looks and fraudulent judgments. At the right times we should speak, and not hold back.
We should let no opportunity slip by without speaking in defense of Christianity and in opposition to the Jews and their hideous Judaism. We should not speak shyly or with caution, but up front, plainly and fully and with courage. We need to speak out in the liberty of the Spirit that becomes an ambassador for Christ.
Paul did speak up and the "Jews" rose up against him, but the Lord went to court with him and threw out his accusers by the hand of a person in high position.
In this city that "Jews flocked to" you must remember that Corinth was a very profane and wicked city, full of impurity of all kinds and idols of all kinds. Yet in this great evil heap, with all its contempt for White Christian Israelites, i.e., the wheat, it sure seemed to human knowledge that the chaff would over come, but in this ore that seems to be all dross, there is gold. Even in Corinth, Christ had much people. So we need to unseat this "fear of the Jews syndrome" and expose their evil, wicked plot to destroy all Christianity. This needs to be done today, before time runs out. Have you come "to know fully" the truth about Judaism and Christianity?
In verses 12‑17 of Acts, Chapter 18, we find another of Paul's many trying times with the Jews {worshipers of Judaism ‑ Traditions of the Elders}. Paul is accused by member of this Jewish sect before the Roman Governor, Gallio. Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, that is he was the proconsul for this province of the Roman Empire. In modern words this Jewish sect filed a frivolous complaint in a Roman court against Paul and Gallio was to be the presiding judge.
Paul was rudely apprehended with violence and fury in broad day light. These Jews cared little for public peace and justice, so they made insurrection. To me this means that they used disturbance of the public peace and force, i.e., vi et armis, to apprehend Paul. They had little concern for his welfare or the safety of others. They, as they do today, already had pronounced Paul guilty in the media of their day. Just as they had at the trials of Christ. These enforcers hurried Paul off, probably in chains, to the judgment seat before Gallio. Paul was allowed no time, whatsoever, to prepare for his trial. Sounds like a familiar patriot scenario of arrest today, does it not?
Paul, much like Christ, is falsely accused before Gallio (v. 13). What was the formal charge? "This fellow persuades men to worship God contrary to the law." My what a crime! Paul must have been "anti‑Semitic." These Jews could not charge him with persuading men not to worship God at all or to worship other Gods.� So the only trumped up charge they could accuse him of breaking was "that he was attempting to persuade men to worship God in a way contrary to the law."
Now what in the world would you consider as being "contrary to the law." Does this sound a familiar alarm today? Sure it does! If you act "contrary" to the "law" of Title 26, your state motor vehicle "laws," or your property appraisal and collection "laws," see how fast you will be jerked up before some judgment seat and be made to pay for your "crimes."
��� The Romans allowed the Jews in all their provinces the observation of their own law. But, remember in verse 2, it is recorded, that Jews had been commanded to leave Rome. I wonder why? Did they have a Jewish problem in the society of that day?
But who would enforce Jewish law in such a city of idols and corruption? Should all persons therefore be prosecuted as criminals, who worship God in any other way than that prescribed by the tenets of Judaism? The big question before Gallio is, "Does Roman toleration include a power of imposition?" Could Roman law force Paul or anyone to stop practicing any activity contrary to what the "Jews" call their law?
You must remember that the Jewish religion hates Christ and all goyium, i.e., White Israelite People. This is why the Jews of Corinth were so uptight against Paul for he was preaching Salvation through the Blood of Christ. This tenet of Israelite Christianity is unacceptable then and today for the Jews of this Pharisaism, i.e., Judaism.
How the so‑called (c)hristian of today can use the term Judeo‑Christian is a gigantic mystery to many. When will the little "c" Christians come "to know fully" that these are two diametrically opposites. Just like black against white, not verses cold and light verses dark?
Paul was charged unjustly. Are White Israelite patriots ever charged unjustly, for violating some phantom law? Do they have ample opportunity to be tried in courts of certified common law venue where justice, fairness and real law prevails? Rarely, if ever, not since about 1861 have justice been had in such courts.
Paul had a different circumstance at this hearing than most patriots are usually afforded today. Gallio had a sweet nature and was sympathetic and apparently a stickler for the letter of the law. For Gallio reasoned that the Jews in their own law, had in it a promise of a Prophet whom God would raise up to them, and they should listen to him and/or hear him. And Paul only persuaded people to believe in this Prophet, who was to come and to hear Him, which was all according "to the law." For this Prophet came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it. Paul's teaching contradicted Judaism, partially the idea of Christ being the Messiah.
At the first hearing or, perhaps, a better way to put it, is no hearing at all, for Gallio dismisses the cause and states that he will not take any cognizance of the issue, at all (v. 14‑15). Paul was just about to make his defense which he apparently became so eloquently accustomed to doing . Paul was about to present evidence that would prove that he did not teach men to worship contrary to the law, when Gallio rules that he will not be troubled with this case and will not pass sentence upon it nor even allow himself the trouble of examining it.
He, Gallio, was very capable of doing the part of a judge in any matter properly placed before him to take cognizance of. He said to the Jews, that were the prosecutors, "If it were a matter of wrong, or wicked lewdness," if you could charge the prisoner with theft or fraud, with murder or plunder or any act of immorality.
We would be bound to hear you with your complaint or accusations. Just because these Jews were loud and noisy and rude petitioners of this court, there was no valid reason to give them a hearing in any obvious unjust case. If the petitioner's cause had been just then it would have been the duty of Gallio or any magistrate to cause justice to be done. That means redress the injured party to be afforded his right(s).
��� Then Gallio would pass comment and give the court's sentence upon the party causing the injury. If the complaint had merits even though not made with all the decorum of a judicial case, Gallio would have felt bound to hear the petitioner, no matter how rude and noisy they were in presenting it. But Gallio will not and did not allow these Jews a chance to make a complaint to him for something not within his jurisdiction (v. 15). Oh, if we had a few judges and magistrates today of the caliber to determine rightful venue and jurisdiction.
This Jude would not allow the Jews to burden his patience by hearing it nor would he burden his conscience with passing judgment upon this matter. And when the Jews hollered and screamed more and more, he found them in contempt of "his" court and drove them from the seat of judgment (v. 16). Then he called the next cause. Bravo, Bravo!!!
This passage makes one think that Gallio conducted himself in a dignified and honorable mode. If only we had judges today who possessed this character. He did not want to, nor even pretend to judge spiritual things that he did not really understand. This judgment would be left to the Jews in matters regarding their religion of Judaism.
Yet he would not allow, the Jews to make him {Gallio} their instrument or tool of malice and pretend to pass judgment against Paul {he was following the example Pilate showed when he washed his hands of the matter concerning Christ, and told the Jews to do what they would, but he would have nothing to do with killing Christ}. Gallio looked upon this matter as not within his venue and jurisdiction and he did not intend to meddle in this affair anymore than a dismissal.
Gallio seems to have understood the law better than he did religious and/or worship. Whether Christ was the Messiah and of God, was not the issue before his court and he felt no need to take "judicial notice" of the law of any God. Whether the Gospel teachings of Christ the Messiah was of divine origin or not as these were not questions of words and names (v. 15) as Gallio scornfully and profanely called them. These are valid concerns for Christianity and Judaism but not for a Roman Court, and he felt because of his ignorance of Judaism and Christianity, he did not want to inquire very far into them.
��� "In 1923, Trotsky, and Lunatcharsky presided over a meeting in Moscow organized by the propaganda section of the Communist party to judge God. Five thousand men of the Red Army were present. The Accused [Almighty God] was found guilty of various ignominious acts and having had the audacity to fail to appear, He [God] was condemned in default."
Then like today, a great contempt was placed upon the court by the Jews and/or Greeks. For they took Sosthenes and beat him in open contempt of Gallio's dismissal of the case against Paul. Look what happened, recently, in California and other places. If the Jews of Judaism can't have it their way against Christians, they will take it out in some other manner.
They were enraged against not only Paul, but also against Gallio and his court of justice. They wanted to be their own prosecutors and if Gallio would not rule in their favor, they would become their own judges and executioners. Apparently the contempt showed what the Jews did, and it did not come before Gallio's court. Gallio cared for none of those things (v. 17) is a puzzling concept of a man who somehow tried to help Paul for whatever reason.
If we can presume that this means that this judge is calloused against the things that bad men do to good men, except when brought into his jurisdiction,we find a flaw in the character of this Roman judge. As a judge he should have protected Sosthenes as much as he did Paul. But the facts point out that he did not. This kind of indifference carries just‑us attitudes that compliments tyranny. His do‑nothing attitude is evidence of one of Isaiah's writings: "that truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter, and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey." Sounds like modern day news reporting, doesn't it?
Our courts today appear to adhere to the concept that justice somehow means just‑us and all outsiders (non‑Jews) will fall in line under its power to be administered by our controlled and/or deceived judges. So ask yourself, is there a "Jew" word problem; or a society "Jew" problem? Can I come "to know fully" the difference between Jewish Judaism and real true Israelite Christianity: The mixing of the two religions don't mix anymore than trying to mix oil and water.
Those who are truly seeking truth have at one time or another had a man/woman sent from God to witness of the Identity Movement and usually they simply ignored it the first time. Then God in His wisdom would send another. This time the messenger would be so convincing that the Truth Seeker would set out to prove him {or the material if it were a book or some other written information} wrong. To prove it a false concept.
Then they found that the more they studied and learned they found that they have been lied to and deceived by a lot of so‑called Christian folks. They came to believe that this was more out of ignorance on their part than deliberate, for they are deceived and content, most of them, to live therein.
But when the Lord reveals much more of His Word to them, they decide to re‑educate themselves and find that the process is a never ending one. Because as they learn more, God will reveal more ‑ making the Scriptures "seek and ye shall find" ever more true. They soon found that the Identity teachings were more on line than fundamental Christianity as taught in the churches, on TV and radio today.
It appears to them that the more they study, research and meditate, the more the world pulls at their time just to make ends meet. So they know how the world will pull at you as you attempt to learn the truth. The Jew today still works as they did in the hay‑day of Corinth to keep True Israelite Christians so busy that they don't have time to stop and smell the roses and find real truth.
It will only be with the help of YHWH {Almighty God} that the financial prison most of us fined ourselves caged in, will open and free us, swinging open the doors of liberty. Such liberty produces the time and resources needed to wage successful campaigns against the onslaught of deceit, lies and deception in todays (c)hristian parishes or folds. Corinthians were famous for their cleverness, inventiveness and artistic sense. They prided themselves in the embellishment of their city and in the adornment of their heathen temples. But, not a single Corinthian ever distinguished himself in literature. Sound Jewish?
The Adamic Man, White People of Israelites i.e., Hebrew stock, are the chosen seed of Israel's race. They need to come to know fully who they are, and what they are. Their heritage demands fulfillment here in this American land, the New Jerusalem as spoken of in the Scriptures. Jesus the Christ, the Salvation of Israel, did not come to the Jewish people. in fact He came against almost everything they stand for. He came to the White Israelites, Matthew 15:24 states: "I am not sent, but to the lost sheep of the House of Israel."
Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following: "Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an Ancient Israelite a� Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or a Hebrew."
The World Book omits any reference to the Jews, but under the word Semite it states: "Semite...Semites are those who speak Semitic languages. In this sense the ancient Hebrews, Assyrians, Phoenicians, and Cartaginians were Semites. The Arabs and some Ethiopians are modern Semitic‑speaking people. Modern Jews are often called Semites, but this name properly applies only to those who use the Hebrew Language. The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the name� Jew' has lost all racial meaning."
Who are the Jews and where is the proof of their existence today? The Jewish Encyclopedia states: "Edom is in modern Jewry."
There is only one nation in the world that can prove ancestral ties with Edom, and the Jews themselves claim that dubious distinction. To help answer this question further, we refer you to the excellent book (which should be required reading) entitled "Who is Esau‑Edom?"� This little book cover the life, history, genealogy, prophecy, predestination and modern identity of Biblical Esau.
Another excellent booklet by Pastor Bob Hallstrom is entitled "Who Are the Pharisees, and the "Jew" Are they Israel?"� If you don't understand the information in these two books, you will be unable to properly understand the central focus of the Scripture. The Dake Annotated Reference Bible, while being a scholarly effort, it provides annotations and perspectives which suffer from the authors lack of an informed basis regarding the true identity of the "Jews," Pharisees, Hebrews, and Israel. In the last century Bram Stocker wrote the book Dracula and in his book he was describing the Jews from the very beginning of their drive to "occupy" our bodies and souls from the very beginning of the Luciferian infiltration of our society.
Now pray with me as I pray the prayer offered up in Psalm 83:1‑84:12: �Keep not thou silence, O God: hold not thy peace, and be not still, O God. For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and THEY (The Jews) THAT HATE THEE HAVE LIFTED UP THE HEAD. THEY (The Jews) HAVE TAKEN crafty COUNSEL AGAINST THY PEOPLE (Israel), AND CONSULTED AGAINST THY HIDDEN ONES. THEY (The Jews) HAVE SAID, COME, AND LET US CUT THEM (Israel) OFF FROM BEING A NATION; THAT THE NAME OF ISRAEL MAY BE NO MORE IN REMEMBRANCE.. For THEY (The Jews) HAVE CONSULTED TOGETHER WITH ONE CONSENT: THEY (The Jews) ARE CONFEDERATE AGAINST THEE: The tabernacles of EDOM (There is Edom [Esau is called Edom in Genesis 36:8. And Edom is in 'Modern Jewry' Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41), and THE ISHMAELITES; OF Moab, and the Hagarenes; Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre; Assur also is joined with them: they have holpen the children of Lot. Selah. Do unto them as unto the Midianites; as to Sisera, as to Jabin, at the brook of Kison: Which perished at Endor: they became as dung for the earth. Make their nobles like Oreb, and like Zeeb: yea, all their princes as Zebah, and as Zalmunna: Who said, LET US (Jews) TAKE TO OURSELVES THE HOUSES OF GOD IN POSSESSION. O MY GOD, MAKE THEM LIKE A WHEEL; AS THE STUBBLE BEFORE THE WIND. AS THE FIRE BURNETH A WOOD, AND AS THE FLAME SETTETH THE MOUNTAINS ON FIRE; SO PERSECUTE THEM WITH THY TEMPEST, AND MAKE THEM AFRAID WITH THY STORM. FILL THEIR FACES WITH SHAME; THAT THEY MAY SEEK THY NAME, O LORD, LET THEM BE CONFOUNDED AND TROUBLED FOR EVER; YEA, LET THEM BE PUT TO SHAME, AND PERISH: That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth.� Amen